I was first introduced to Carl Jung in Spring 1990 when I took Modern Spiritual Masters at university. While I received a B, I will have to admit that I did not retain much from that course. I was just coming from a highly religious period in my life (to err is human, to forgive, divine and code of silence (#sue, #secretsociety123)), and was reconciling that Judaism and not accepting Jesus as one's personal savior did not equate to damnation and hell, so was not in the mindset to be receptive of new age concepts.
Over the years, I seem to have developed this innate ability to have people, including strangers, open up and disclose personal things that they do not often freely discuss. Part of it is because my curiosity of learning how people tick causes me to ask probing questions that many somehow feel are inappropriate to 'intrude' and therefore, do not ask themselves. Part is because as I have been told, I come off non-judgmental and sometimes openly communicate my life experiences in an unfiltered way. That environment often encourages people to be vulnerable.
So during this period that I am facing my fears and intentionally walking into darkness, it was interesting to cross paths with Jung again. In general, I have learned to love my jiggly parts (unanswered prayers) and have embraced the perceived shortcomings of my personality over the years. As I have told my mentees, anyone can turn a negative to a positive and vice versa depending on agenda or perspective. My penchant to get bored easily and constant desire to do something new and challenging in my professional career was viewed by me as being flighty and noncommittal; however, those in leadership had viewed this same characteristic as a strength in my ability to learn something new in a very short time frame and be successful, thereby reinventing myself and adapting to market changes.
I have always procrastinated (100 days). While my friends and family have learned to adjust, this same trait also allows me to be adaptable to changes and enjoy unplanned moments in life. Recognizing this long ago has also forced me to be patient with others who are the same. In treating people as I would like to be treated, the concept also works in the reverse to be accepting of others for things I do myself (full circle (part 2)). I have also learned that it is more important to treat people as they would want to be treated, which may not be the same as I would want to be treated. Similar to David Bowie's life experience (full circle (part 8)), Jung delved into his own troubling mind to discover that we have to learn to accept our own darkness before we can attempt to help others, either on an individual or global level.
As Alan Watts noted, "[Jung] would not condemn the things in others and would therefore not be lead into those thoughts, feelings, and acts of violence towards others which are always characteristic of the people who project the devil in themselves upon the outside – upon somebody else – upon the scapegoat." Psychological dissonance is when we project our shadow onto others, refuse to take ownership of ourselves, distancing ourselves from ourselves, and thereby, losing ourselves in the process - allowing neurosis to take over our psyche.
Jung introduced 'unprejudiced objectivity' in a lecture to clergymen. His view is that only when we accept our fears, shame, guilt and judgment that we can see others for who they truly are. Otherwise, we would naturally avoid parts of others that remind us of these parts of ourselves. Without this acceptance of ourselves, genuine compassion and authentic connection would be a challenge as one is about being in someone else's shoes and the other about acceptance of the whole person.
One of the people from when it rains, it pours that recently contacted me was someone who fell in love with me and professed to be polyamorous, yet could not take responsibility for her own decisions when her partner gave her an ultimatum, so instead created lies and went as far as to ask me to treat her like 'shit' so that she could justify her decision. At the time, I had told her that I would not give her the satisfaction to justify that the world is 'cruel' to allow her to 'play victim' within her bipolar mentality. However, and as I recently communicated to her, her 'altered reality' to blame others for her own actions in life, including her continuing belief in her lies, is not a person who takes ownership of herself nor whom I would choose to surround myself with.
It is fascinating to finally acquire an appreciation for a modern spiritual master, who in his own way learned to love his darkness and left insights for us to love ourselves, individually and collectively (trifecta; to err is human, to forgive, divine; and stone skipping (part 7)).
As Alan Watts noted, "[Jung] would not condemn the things in others and would therefore not be lead into those thoughts, feelings, and acts of violence towards others which are always characteristic of the people who project the devil in themselves upon the outside – upon somebody else – upon the scapegoat." Psychological dissonance is when we project our shadow onto others, refuse to take ownership of ourselves, distancing ourselves from ourselves, and thereby, losing ourselves in the process - allowing neurosis to take over our psyche.
Jung introduced 'unprejudiced objectivity' in a lecture to clergymen. His view is that only when we accept our fears, shame, guilt and judgment that we can see others for who they truly are. Otherwise, we would naturally avoid parts of others that remind us of these parts of ourselves. Without this acceptance of ourselves, genuine compassion and authentic connection would be a challenge as one is about being in someone else's shoes and the other about acceptance of the whole person.
"...Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses. I am the oppressor of the person I condemn, not his friend and fellow-sufferer. I do not in the least mean to say that we must never pass judgment when we desire to help and improve. But if the doctor wishes to help a human being he must be able to accept him as he is. And he can do this in reality only when he has already seen and accepted himself as he is.
Perhaps this sounds very simple, but simple things are always the most difficult. In actual life it requires the greatest art to be simple, and so acceptance of oneself is the essence of the moral problem and the acid test of one’s whole outlook on life...
But what if I should discover that the least amongst them all, the poorest of all beggars, the most impudent of all offenders, yeah, the very fiend himself, that these are within me, and that I myself stand in need of the alms of my own kindness, that I myself am the enemy who must be loved. What then?...
Anyone...will admit that to accept himself in all his wretchedness is the hardest of tasks, and one which it is almost impossible to fulfill.
The very thought can make us sweat with fear. We are therefore only too delighted to choose, without a moment’s hesitation, the complicated course of remaining in ignorance about ourselves while busying ourselves with other people and their troubles and sins. This activity lends us a perceptible air of virtue, by means of which we benevolently deceive ourselves and others...
...Only he who has fully accepted himself has 'unprejudiced objectivity'.”
~ Carl JungWhen I realized the mirroring that was occurring in full circle (part 2), I became more conscious and aware of moments where I would catch myself internally 'judging' others, mostly fleeting thoughts creeping from random strangers. I started to allow myself to 'sit' in that feeling to understand where that negative space was coming from, similar to reclaiming the cunt (part 3), and either learn/grow from where I may be projecting my own lack of self love and/or not be ashamed for such feelings and thoughts.
One of the people from when it rains, it pours that recently contacted me was someone who fell in love with me and professed to be polyamorous, yet could not take responsibility for her own decisions when her partner gave her an ultimatum, so instead created lies and went as far as to ask me to treat her like 'shit' so that she could justify her decision. At the time, I had told her that I would not give her the satisfaction to justify that the world is 'cruel' to allow her to 'play victim' within her bipolar mentality. However, and as I recently communicated to her, her 'altered reality' to blame others for her own actions in life, including her continuing belief in her lies, is not a person who takes ownership of herself nor whom I would choose to surround myself with.
It is fascinating to finally acquire an appreciation for a modern spiritual master, who in his own way learned to love his darkness and left insights for us to love ourselves, individually and collectively (trifecta; to err is human, to forgive, divine; and stone skipping (part 7)).
Neurosis is an inner cleavage — the state of being at war with oneself. Everything that accentuates this cleavage makes the patient worse, and everything that mitigates it tends to heal him. What drives people to war with themselves is the suspicion or the knowledge that they consist of two persons in opposition to one another. The conflict may be between the sensual and the spiritual man, or between the ego and the shadow. It is what Faust means when he says: “Two souls, alas, dwell in my breast apart.” A neurosis is a splitting of personality.
~ Carl Jung
* * * * *
Update June 11, 2017:
The woman who asked me to treat her like 'shit' communicated today that she has been working on individual therapy, and realized that her treatment of others was due to not loving herself. She reached out to finally take responsibility for her actions and apologize. I am happy that she is trying to work through her demons and following suit with others in absolution. I hope she learns to forgive and love herself on her path to happiness.