There is a saying here that everybody wants the title but not the responsibility (see prior posts stone skipping (part 1), sweat shop, and a box of crayons). This is also why every email is filled with a long distribution list of everyone being cc'ed to the point where nobody reads the email, deletes, and assumes someone else is responsible for it. Within my first few months here, I was told, rather than asked, to present on a topic specific to Vietnam. If it related to US or international standards, perhaps the logical choice may have been me, but it seemed as if the other 10+ individuals in senior management would have been more credible rather than the Vietkieu who has only been in the country for less than three months, plus it would have eliminated the translator. However, since nobody else wanted to do it, I was left holding the bag, which usually explains all the multiple hats I wear at work.
Every year we are required to sign declarations that we are aware of policies, yet I find that they constantly tell me that I need to re-communicate those policies, and when there are continuous infractions, it is my responsibility to do a live training because I should 'know' that nobody reads emails. Having someone who is the 'new kid on the block' who hasn't been taught the policies herself to teach the policies to others is somehow illogical only to me. Saying that individuals should be responsible for reading policies and paying attention to the multiple training media fall on deaf ears, as the responsibility somehow falls on me.
It came up in a management meeting last week that I needed to focus more attention on knowing when people didn't understand me and to recognize those situations and clarify. Turns out that rather than following up with me when another partner did not understand policy, he decided to post his complaint to the functional leader that she needed to educate me on how to 'communicate better and cooperate' rather than do the obvious of recognizing that he needed to read the policy and educate himself or to follow up and ask clarifying questions. As is my style, I addressed him directly, took off all the cc's (which he then put back on and added others), and after numerous re-attachments of prior communications, it was clear that his only point was that senior leadership needed to "work with [me] for better communication and cooperation" since it was not his role.
So to all the native English speakers (since clearly it is being stated that English is neither my first nor second language), I ask you how clear or unclear the following messages were:
- "...you have to create another XYZ file. The file should...provide a reference to the prior case ID as an audit trail." [communication in August based on generic errors/mistakes going forward]
- "Please resubmit all of these cases to get appropriate approvals in the system." [in September when his case got flagged with an error]
- "You should create a new XYZ referencing the old case ID as noted in last month's communication (attached) to ensure that it has sufficient approvals." [in September when he responded that he took a shortcut and did it manually, and I reattached the August communication]
- "As noted in the attached response,...you will need to create another XYZ." [in October when he continued to respond that he did it manually, and I reattached the prior communications]
- "Going forward, [the cases] will require different XYZ to replace the old ones." [same day in October when he responded "Do you mean I need to create a XYZ case to replace the below case?" - to end the back and forth, I communicated to him that I decided to grant him another exception to do it manually, at which point was when he went to the functional leader to lodge a complaint on my lack of communication and cooperation]
Now, his suggestion on how I should have communicated this from the beginning was "do another cases to replace the former cases even the jobs have been done". That same communication in September regarding 'resubmitting' was sent to five other individuals with errors, of which nobody else had any issues with the instructions that were initially provided. Of course, the functional leader jumped on his bandwagon as well.
I attended a presentation yesterday regarding the 'new normal' as it relates to the global economy and changes in the business environment. The speaker noted: "Management is the ability to deal with challenges. Leadership is the ability to deal with changes." If the challenge that we are stuck on is the Vietnamese schooling the American on English, we are all in a world of hurt!